What You'll Find...


An Ongoing Discussion about Christ and Culture in a Post-Postmodern Context.
or
Resurrection-Shaped Stories from the Emmaus Road.

What They're Saying...

(about the book)
"A remarkable book. Raffi's is a dramatic and powerful story and I am privileged to have been part of it."
- N.T. Wright

(about the blog)
"Raffi gets it."
- Michael Spencer, a.k.a. The Internet Monk

A Post-Evangelical Manifesto

On Wednesday, May 7th, a group of Evangelical leaders jointly released what is being called The Evangelical Manifesto. According to the website:

An Evangelical Manifesto is an open declaration of who Evangelicals are and what they stand for. It has been drafted and published by a representative group of Evangelical leaders who do not claim to speak for all Evangelicals, but who invite all other Evangelicals to stand with them and help clarify what Evangelical means in light of “confusions within and the consternation without” the movement. As the Manifesto states, the signers are not out to attack or exclude anyone, but to rally and to call for reform.

You can access the short version of the Manifesto here.

I appreciate the spirit in which the Manifesto was conceived and is being put forward. And I can put this in a million different ways, but I think I'll go with this: There was a time for the martyrs. There was a time for the Contantinian settlement. There was a time for the Great Trinitarian Debates. There was a time for Christendom. There was a time for the Reformation. There was a time for Liberalism. There was a time for Neo-Orthodoxy. And there was a time for Evangelicalism, as popularly construed.

The damage, however, was done when these movements held on too long. At their best and brightest, these were all movements with gigantically important things to say, wrongs to right, and light to shine.

But then, each in its own time, something very dangerous happened.

They became enthralled by the success of their movement, by the righteousness of their protest. They became entrenched. They became stagnant. They slowly began to elevate, and then to equate, the rallying cries of their movement to the gospel message itself.

In the words of N.T. Wright, woe betide us if in our efforts to win yesterday's battles, we ignore today's and tomorrow's.

And so, with fear and trembling, I present here a suggestion for a Post-Evangelical Manifesto. You don't have to sign it to demonstrate your support. There will be no press releases. I simply pray that it reaches the ears, and hearts, of my brothers and sisters in Christ. And it reads as follows:

A Post-Evangelical Manifesto

Having first expressed the utmost gratitude to our Evangelical forebearers and brethren, we who today define ourselves, with pride and by necessity, as Post-Evangelicals, do so primarily as women and men who have heard the voice of Evangelicalism, learned from it, lived within it, and have now made the choice to move forward. We view our Evangelical traditions with reverence and respect, but we consider those traditions to have been stepping stones in the historical quest of the people of God, guided by the Spirit, for and in furtherance of a loftier and more glorious ideal, namely, and in shorthand terms, the Kingdom of God coming on earth as it is in heaven.

We who define ourselves, with pride and by necessity, as Post-Evangelicals, believe, as do our Evangelical brethren, in:

1. Jesus, fully divine and fully human, as the only full and complete revelation of God and therefore the only Savior.
2. The death of Jesus on the cross, in which he took the penalty for our sins and reconciled us to God.
3. Salvation as God’s gift grasped through faith. We contribute nothing to our salvation.
4. New life in the Holy Spirit, who brings us spiritual rebirth and power to live as Jesus did, reaching out to the poor, sick, and oppressed.
5. The Bible as God’s Word written, fully trustworthy as our final guide to faith and practice.
6. The future personal return of Jesus to establish the reign of God.
7. The importance of sharing these beliefs so that others may experience God’s salvation and may walk in Jesus’ way.

We believe in each of these doctrinal statements. Our primary concern lies not in the truth of these doctrinal statements, but in their very reduction to doctrinal statements. Our Evangelical forebearers and brethren courageously proclaimed the above truths in a context where the very truth of the matters asserted were being challenged, and the challengers were gaining footholds. Once again, we praise and honor them for that courage.

However, we have come recognize that these statements are, and were originally intended to be, packed shorthand expressions for richly complex historical narratives, and the theological implications gleaned from them. They were packed into doctrinal form for reasons not dissimilar to why we pack a suitcase to travel. The suitcase allows ease of travel. But to make full use of the process, one must unpack the suitcase once the destination has been reached. We Post-Evangelicals have come to recognize that these doctrinal statements, once packed, tended to remain packed. And the longer they remained packed, the more the rich, complex and varied truths remaining inside were forgotten.

As Post-Evangelicals, we feel called by the Spirit of the God revealed in Jesus Christ to, at long last, re-open the suitcases of these doctrinal statements, to begin to re-examine the rich narratives that have, for so long, been gathering mold and dust. Sadly, we, too, have and shall continue to fail to live up to our high calling. But we stand in fervent prayer that such failures may be caused by our own fallen natures, and not by the defining qualities of the movement whose principals we proclaim.

We do not see the privatization of faith as an "equal and opposite error" to the politicization of faith. The faith to which Christ has called us has always been a public, political faith, and never a dualistic, gnostic, holy huddle. Our dispute lies in the nature by which that political faith is exercised.

We have grown weary of the notion of a religious tolerance in a pluralistic society, which we see as the position of of our forebearers and brethren, at their best. We do not seek tolerance. We seek love, as revealed in the person of Jesus Christ, of which tolerance is a weak parody, at best.

Post-Evangelicals are people who also define themselves, their faith, and their lives according to the Good News of Jesus of Nazareth (euangelion). But, unlike the Manifesto of our brethren, we feel compelled to examine what specifically that good news is, for if left undefined, it has a tendency to become reduced to a purely internal spiritual transformation, which may be very powerful but is Christianly incomplete. In packaged shorthand form, we understand that the euangelion is that the crucified and risen Jesus was, and is, Israel's Messiah and thereby the world's true Lord who, having ushered in God's age-old plan to save all of creation, demands our allegiance, an allegiance colored by and consisting in faith.

We stand on the shoulders of giants, committed to plunge forward. We are a generation shaped by the postmodern critique, but by the grace of God we refuse to lapse into the nihilism which that critique may otherwise ensnare us. We see truth in narratives, are cautious of oppressive narratives, but see in the narrative of the God revealed in Christ no such hint of oppression.

We pledge that in a world of lies, hype and spin, we are called to live and speak and act and think and imagine and create and work and celebrate and worship and relate to one another in faith, hope and love.

But the greatest of these is love.

The End



Subscribe TwitThis

20 Comments:

  1. Anonymous said...
     

    very nice! and written in a good spirit. thanks!

  2. Anonymous said...
     

    Very clear, concise, and well written. It was also encouraging - I resonate with the transition from doctrinal summation to narrative proclamation, and without the abandonment of the former. I'll def put up the link!

  3. Anonymous said...
     

    Hey bro,

    Sorry to clog up your blog with links. Your blog just gives me too much to think of! I've struggled to understand some of the things you've written brother, so would you read my comments and explain your position further?

    Sorry again.

    Tim

  4. Raffi Shahinian said...
     

    Thank you, Andrew. That means a lot coming from you.

    Glad you saw that connection, Zack.

    Tim, great questions on your site. I'm gonna need some time to think them through before I respond. Thanks for engaging with those difficult and important issues.

    Grace and Peace,
    Raffi

  5. oldfatslow said...
     

    The early church knew that Jesus was not one god among many and they died with the confession "Christ is Lord" on their lips.

    N. T. Wright has said that there are times when he wishes we would translate Christ as King. Maybe then evangelicals would remember whom they serve. I think it was Kuyper who said that everywhere God walks He can point and say mine. We need to start acting like it.

    Thanks for your words.

    ofs

  6. Anonymous said...
     

    That's a very good start.

    A little something of Christ's command that we baptise and take his Supper would have finished it off nicely.

    But I realize that for many that may be carrying the 'Post' part of 'Post'-Evangelical a bit too far.

    - Steve M.

  7. Anonymous said...
     

    Well said. Liam

  8. Dan Martin said...
     

    Hey Raffi, I realize I'm late to the party, but I just found your blog off of NTWrightPage (methinks maybe a few others will as well. . .)

    You're asking important questions here, but as I browse around your blog I think I'd like to see you push even further in specific response to the Manifesto. While I, too, affirm the spirit in which it was intended; and while you made clear in your "unpacking" analogy that the seven doctrinal statements need some re-examination, I really would go further and suggest that not all of them even belong on the list. . .in part, of course, because of the baggage with which they have been saddled by Evangelical Fundamentalists.

    You are absolutely right in your statement "Our primary concern lies not in the truth of these doctrinal statements, but in their very reduction to doctrinal statements." I blogged on a similar notion a few months ago myself.

    But as you know, a number of very devout believers that I think might fit your "post-Evangelical" rubric are even re-examining the Biblical basis for statements about Jesus' nature, the purpose of his death, what atonement and salvation mean (a couple more posts of mine), the nature of Biblical inspiration (I wrote a whole series on this), and so on.

    In short--and I'm really inviting dialog here so I hope my multiple links don't concern you--I think that the very notion of doctrinal statements themselves, and more particularly the content of those statements, needs to be severely re-examined if whatever Post-Evangelicalism grows into is to meaningfully reflect Jesus. Your own post on Systematic Theology is enough to convince me that I think you get it.

    Peace!

    Dan

  9. Raffi Shahinian said...
     

    Dan,

    Thanks for your immensely thoughtful comment. I hear what you're saying about the content of traditional doctrinal statements, and I think if you look around a bit more you'd see that I'm totally on board with what you're saying. The process of re-examining the themes you've mentioned, I think you'd agree, is a lifelong process, if not a human-history-long one.

    I'm looking forward to reading the posts you've graciously linked to, but given my schedule, it'll be some time in the future.

    Great to have you around these parts.

    Grace and Peace,
    Raffi

  10. Dan Martin said...
     

    The process of re-examining the themes you've mentioned, I think you'd agree, is a lifelong process, if not a human-history-long one.

    I absolutely agree with you, Raffi. One of the things that troubles me greatly in many debates on doctrine I hear swirling about, is the assumption (sometimes implicit, sometimes explicit) that those controversies "resolved" at, say, Nicea, Constantinople, or Trent, or in the works of Calvin or Luther (or for that matter, Wright or Piper) are now closed and ought not be re-examined. Wright, at least, would agree with the statement that faith must be a continuing dialog between the Living Word (by which I mean Jesus, not a book), the recorded writings, and faithful followers past and present. The "settled doctrines" of history, IMHO, represent more who won a local struggle, than they do a closed question of faith or practice. Again, I suspect I'm preaching to the choir. . . ;{)

  11. Raffi Shahinian said...
     

    Indeed. But thanks for articulating it so nicely. Might cut 'n paste that one one of these days.

    Grace and Peace,
    Raffi

  12. Raffi Shahinian said...
     

    Thank you, Tessa.

    Hope to hear from you more often, then.

    Grace and Peace,
    Raffi

  13. Donna said...
     

    Yes! Thanks for writing this.

  14. Anonymous said...
     

    Stannapalsems
    Bbof

  15. Anonymous said...
     

    Stannapalsems
    Bfof

  16. Anonymous said...
     

    Nocagyncron
    abog

  17. Anonymous said...
     

    Yes undoubtedly, in some moments I can reveal that I jibe consent to with you, but you may be in the light of other options.
    to the article there is even now a question as you did in the fall delivery of this request www.google.com/ie?as_q=bps spywareadware remover 9.4.0.3 ?
    I noticed the catch-phrase you have not used. Or you use the dreary methods of promotion of the resource. I possess a week and do necheg
    Your Ferrdenants :)

  18. Anonymous said...
     

    FumHepeTuptus
    yb5g

  19. Anonymous said...
     

    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/candy%20dvd%20download/]candy dvd download[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20the%20opportunists%20dvd/]download the opportunists dvd[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/buy%20soldier%20movie/]buy soldier movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20meet%20wally%20sparks%20movie%20online/]download meet wally sparks movie online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/harrington%20desmond%20exit%20speed%20movie/]harrington desmond exit speed movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/watch%20wheres%20the%20party%20yaar%20online/]watch wheres the party yaar online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20bless%20the%20child%20movie%20online/]download bless the child movie online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20frankenstein%20full%20movie/]download frankenstein full movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/watch%20the%20tattooist%20movie%20online/]watch the tattooist movie online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/barbie%20as%20the%20island%20princess%20movie%20download/]barbie as the island princess movie download[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/caligula%20movie%20download/]caligula movie download[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/moore%20roger%20007%20view%20to%20a%20kill%20a%20movie/]moore roger 007 view to a kill a movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20rapid%20fire%20full%20movie/]download rapid fire full movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/watch%20valiant%20online/]watch valiant online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20the%20ninth%20gate%20online/]download the ninth gate online[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/greenhouse%20kate%20the%20dark%20hours/]greenhouse kate the dark hours[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20blood%20diamond%20movie/]download blood diamond movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20the%20stranger%20dvd/]download the stranger dvd[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/buy%20van%20helsing%20movie/]buy van helsing movie[/URL]
    [URL=http://www.jumptags.com/topic/download%20alien%20intruder%20online/]download alien intruder online[/URL]

  20. Anonymous said...
     

    Poimajotflili
    [url=http://www.ekccc.org]adipex diet pill[/url]
    Nadafuele
    [url=http://noweatthis.net]generic ambien[/url]
    Fizalefeera
    [url=http://www.thegibsoncompany.com]combinatorial chemistry of lorazepam[/url]
    expemybrootte

Post a Comment



 

     



Creative Commons License
Parables of a Prodigal World by Raffi Shahinian is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.